Monday, January 26, 2015

Readers will probably have heard on television and on billboards seen such phrase as


Woods is still the vast majority - vlastist nation state property. But the debate goes: Do not pass them all in private hands - say, private owner more efficient. In dyskusiyyi on the effectiveness of private and public owners are extremely cm101 fun helpful and interesting cm101 fun next article, although the direction of the forest and it does not touch. Oleg November.
Readers will probably have heard on television and on billboards seen such phrase as "European socialism". I will be surprised that this concept is more ideological than economic, and if it appears in economics, in the analysis of economic cm101 fun life, not economic models. Suffice it to mention that some Arab countries in the 1970s also built the "Arab socialism," which was laid in the same plane with the "European socialism" and was a political cm101 fun movement that rejected the foundations of materialism.
However, the very notion of "socialism" in today's global economy better attributed to socio-political system rather than an economic concept. And above all, the fact that the economic fundamentals of the theory cm101 fun of scientific socialism developed in the nineteenth century ideologues cm101 fun and were based on the postulate of the incompatibility of socialism with commodity-money relations, and modern European economic model (including Swedish) use economic concepts cm101 fun neoclassical synthesis, based on the need of commodity-money relations cm101 fun that economically evolve today. Therefore, it appears that "socialism" - a socio-political system, which countries cm101 fun are trying to achieve through building cm101 fun a specific economic model.
If you ask a Ukrainian supporters of "European socialism" of how economically they rozbudovuvatymut a political and social order, it is likely you can hear only one thing: everything is fairly rich pay more, poor, respectively - less! Or to socialism - because capitalism with a human face. Whether on state regulation of market relations and objections unmanaged cm101 fun market. With all this we can agree, but the economy is little more than statements of declarative character! It would therefore cm101 fun be interesting to talk about the economic foundations of "socialism" cm101 fun in some European countries.
At the word "Scandinavian socialism" once an association with "Swedish socialism." However, I would like to begin consideration of the economic model of Norway, as socialists, representing Labour Party, formed the first socialist government still 1928, the very first of the Nordic countries. Speaking of the ruling coalition in Norway, the Labour Party led government in 1971-1972, 1973-1981, 1986-1989, 1990-1997, 2000-2001, 2005-2009 with, and from 2009 to present. In many cases it is due to the country's Workers' cm101 fun Party was established welfare state - a state where the form of government is a constitutional monarchy!
Some say that all socialism Norway - a profit of energy. However, it should be noted and such. First, socialism is not an end in Norway nor in 1986 nor in 1993 or 1998, when the global economic situation did not promote cm101 fun the sale of oil, not curled in 2008-2009, when the EU suffered from the global financial crisis and Norway has invested in the global cm101 fun economy during the crisis years, nearly $ 200 billion. Second, cm101 fun the idea of a mixed economy, the ruling Labour Party began to implement when oil and gas deposits not exploited across a major national income, based on fishing was fishing. Therefore socialization super-profits from the sale of energy in the world market - is not the basis of the economic model, and the consequences of the process of socialization of the economy as a natural resource for the benefit of all Norwegians, not just selected is happening now in Ukraine.
Of course, these profits, which now receives nearly 5 million Norwegians to open in 1989. Ekofisk oil field, they were not. However, the level of social awareness Norway pointed to the economy more than the same income on energy. For some reason, none of the governments of Norway, and in the King Harald V, not any desire, even during the crisis period for the oil and gas industry, privatize the industry!
Today Norwegian FEC system based on state ownership and active state regulation. It is state-owned companies in the late 1960s began search and gas exploration and development started their own, without the involvement of outside investors and maintaining control over the following years for the country's fuel resources through public companies involved in exploration and production license system, the practice of awarding government share in each field, and through further socialization taxes and fees. And if briefly

No comments:

Post a Comment